60 hours of silence now bury the security bug dismissal pattern with no LuckyFun response in sight

Second security researcher comes forward with dismissal story

A second security researcher has now come forward with a story that closely mirrors an earlier incident, suggesting a troubling pattern at LuckyFun. The researcher, known as @GambaAvero, reports discovering an Email Flooding Vulnerability in the casino's Discord server about a month ago. After the team quickly fixed the issue, they allegedly refused to pay and later ignored all follow-up communications.

This matches the experience of another researcher, @exxoticxH1, who was told 'We are not interested sorry' after submitting a security bug and was subsequently banned from the Discord server for asking why his ticket was closed. Both accounts describe the same dismissive treatment: vulnerabilities acknowledged and fixed, but no compensation—and the reporters left with nothing but a dead-end conversation.

@GambaAvero confirms pattern: reported Email Flooding Vulnerability, team fixed it, then refused to pay

A second security researcher, @GambaAvero, has come forward to report an identical experience with LuckyFun. He discovered an Email Flooding Vulnerability in the casino's Discord server a month ago, which the team promptly fixed—only to later ignore him and refuse any payment or acknowledgment for the discovery.

This mirrors the earlier account from @exxoticxH1, who was told 'We are not interested sorry' and then banned from the Discord after reporting a separate vulnerability. Two independent researchers now describe the same dismissive treatment: LuckyFun silently patches the flaw, then ghosts the reporter when it’s time to honor any bounty or compensation.

For players weighing whether to trust this casino, the pattern raises serious questions about how the operator handles security disclosures and treats those who try to help. A commitment to securing the platform is meaningless if the people who surface those vulnerabilities are met with silence or exclusion.

@GambaAvero report solidifies pattern but no new voices join across 24 hours

Two independent security researchers have now reported the same troubling pattern at LuckyFun: each disclosed a vulnerability, saw it silently fixed, and then was dismissed or banned when requesting payment. This suggests that the casino may be deliberately avoiding its bug bounty obligations, raising serious concerns about its trustworthiness.

The most recent account comes from a researcher known as @GambaAvero, who reported an email flooding vulnerability a month ago via Discord. After the team fixed the issue, they refused to pay, telling him they were "not interested sorry" and then ignored further messages. This mirrors the earlier experience of @exxoticxH1, who was also banned from the community.

Although the evidence is consistent, it remains limited: no additional voices have joined the discussion in the past 24 hours, and both reports have drawn minimal attention. Players should weigh this pattern carefully—while not yet a widespread outcry, it reveals a potential culture of dismissing those who help secure the platform.

Security bug dismissal pattern stands at two researchers with no resolution or new reports

Two independent security researchers have now come forward with near-identical accounts of how LuckyFun handles vulnerability reports: acknowledge the bug silently, fix it, then ghost the reporter when compensation is requested. The most recent voice, @GambaAvero, disclosed an Email Flooding Vulnerability in the casino's Discord server a month ago, which the team promptly patched before refusing payment and ignoring further messages. This mirrors the experience of @exxoticxH1, who was told 'We are not interested sorry' and then banned from the Discord entirely after pressing for a response.

Over the past 24 hours, no new researchers or players have joined either account, and LuckyFun has issued no public statement addressing the allegations. The pattern remains confined to two voices, but the consistency between them is striking: each reported a genuine security flaw, each saw it fixed without acknowledgment, and each was left with nothing but silence or exclusion.

For players evaluating trust, the question is not whether LuckyFun patches bugs — it clearly does — but whether the operator can be relied upon to treat those who help secure the platform with basic professionalism. Dismissing security researchers may keep bug bounty costs down in the short term, but it signals a culture that prioritises avoiding obligation over building trust. The absence of new reports could mean the issue has run its course, or it could mean researchers have simply learned not to bother.

48 hours of total silence freeze the security bug dismissal pattern with no resolution in sight

The security bug dismissal story has now gone completely silent across 48 hours. No new researchers have stepped forward, no existing voices have escalated their claims, and LuckyFun has issued no public response to either @GambaAvero or @exxoticxH1. The pattern that emerged last week — vulnerabilities acknowledged and silently patched, reporters dismissed or banned — stands frozen at exactly two accounts, neither resolved nor contradicted.

The absence of new voices cuts both ways. It could mean the story has simply run its course, with the two researchers representing the full extent of the issue. But it could also mean that other researchers have watched what happened and learned not to bother — a chilling effect that would be invisible in the data but deeply corrosive to trust. Either way, a casino that genuinely valued security disclosure would have addressed these allegations by now, either publicly or through direct outreach to the reporters.

For players evaluating LuckyFun today, the core question remains unanswered: does this operator treat people who try to help it with basic professionalism? Two researchers say no, and LuckyFun's sustained silence does nothing to contradict them. The bug patching itself is not in dispute — the casino does fix vulnerabilities — but the pattern of ghosting the people who find them signals a culture of avoiding obligation rather than building trust.

Silence stretches past 54 hours as the security story enters terminal fade

What was a 48-hour freeze has now stretched past 54 hours of complete silence. No new researchers, no LuckyFun statement, no resolution of any kind. The two-account pattern reported last week has not grown, but neither has it been addressed. For a story that briefly looked like it might expose a systemic bug bounty culture, the total absence of follow-through from either side now signals a quiet death rather than an escalation.

For players who followed this closely, the takeaway is unsatisfying but clear: LuckyFun patches vulnerabilities when they are reported, but appears unwilling to compensate or even acknowledge the people who find them. The two researchers have moved on, and the casino seems content to let the whole thing fade without comment. Whether this reflects a deliberate strategy of stonewalling or simply indifference to external security researchers, the result is the same for anyone considering whether to trust this operator with their disclosures.