Three days since Popitics surfaced lawsuit details tying StakeUS to Akademiks botting campaigns: no public response from Stake, no new filings, and the story has gone silent on X.

Lawsuit filing alleges Akademiks was paid through StakeUS for botting and algorithm manipulation

Three days have passed since Popitics surfaced explosive details from the Demoree v. Desiree Perez consolidated lawsuit, alleging that StakeUS compensated Akademiks—George Nguyen—for orchestrating botting and clipping campaigns. The filing claims Nguyen interacted with bot vendors and oversaw efforts to manipulate social media algorithms, with funds funneled through StakeUS to disparage competitors and music label executives. Despite the gravity of these accusations, Stake has yet to issue a public statement or file any legal response, and the story has quietly faded from X.

Lawsuit story goes quiet with no new developments since June 22

A lawsuit filed by Popitics has resurfaced, directly naming AkademiksTV—run by George Nguyen—and alleging he coordinated with bot vendors to run clipping and botting campaigns across social media, all while being compensated through the gambling platform Stake US. The filing goes further, claiming the funds were used to “disparage competitors & music label executives” and to “distort recommendation algorithms,” painting a picture of a coordinated effort to manipulate online discourse at Stake’s expense.

Despite these explicit claims, Stake US has offered no public response in the three days since the details surfaced. No new court filings have emerged, and the story has quietly faded from X timelines. For a player weighing trust in a casino, the silence is notable—especially when paired with past allegations against Akademiks, such as inappropriate remarks to a minor. The legal filing remains active, but without Stake addressing the accusations, the unresolved cloud over their operations lingers.