Both VIP complaints now go fully silent with zero posts in 48 hours, 41 days without any Roobet response or resolution

hairlessEV exposes Roobet blocking $400K VIP withdrawal while streamers collect millions

Casino investigator hairlessEV exposed that Roobet blocked a verified VIP player from withdrawing $400,000, offering no timeline for release. Screenshots showed the platform still allowing gambling on the account while refusing payout, prompting immediate community backlash.

Influencer YogiGambles highlighted the glaring contradiction: Roobet sends weekly million-dollar payouts to streamers like Stevewilldoit and Togi, yet freezes a loyal VIP's legitimate withdrawal. Community members now view streamer deals as evidence of a system that prioritizes promotional spending over fair treatment of regular high rollers.

Forty-one days after the story broke, Roobet has issued zero responses or resolutions, and complaints have gone silent in the last 48 hours. For players evaluating trust, this pattern suggests the platform selectively enforces withdrawal policies, favoring visible streamers while leaving VIPs in limbo.

Resources247 doubles down: withdrawal cancelled, self-exclusion overridden three times

A VIP player named Resources247 reports that Roobet canceled a withdrawal and overrode a self-exclusion request three times, causing them to lose their funds back to the casino—a pattern they highlight as deliberate exploitation. This complaint has remained unanswered for 41 days, with no posts from the player in the last 48 hours, signaling deepening frustration and a complete lack of engagement from Roobet.

Another VIP player, DaniloQ86085, claims that after wagering $2 million, their birthday bonus was just $200—a stark contrast to the expected rewards for high-volume players. This reinforces concerns that Roobet's VIP program undervalues loyalty, further eroding trust in the casino's commitment to its most valuable customers.

VIP birthday bonus complaint adds to trust-and-safety concerns as Resources247 allegation passes 5 days without response

A VIP player who has wagered $2 million on Roobet received only a $200 birthday bonus, calling it the worst VIP treatment in their experience. This complaint emerges alongside a separate detailed allegation from Resources247, who claims Roobet canceled a withdrawal and overrode self-exclusion not once, but three times, allowing them to lose their funds back to the casino.

Both issues have now gone fully silent for 48 hours, with 41 days passing without any response or resolution from Roobet. The lack of communication on two serious trust-and-safety concerns—one involving a high-value VIP and the other involving repeated withdrawal cancellation and self-exclusion abuse—is fueling growing community distrust.

Resources247 doubles down with new post, joined by second VIP birthday-bonus complaint

Resources247 reports that Roobet canceled a $400K VIP withdrawal and overrode his self-exclusion three separate times, each time allowing him to gamble away the funds he had tried to secure. Separately, DaniloQ86085 notes that despite wagering $2 million on the platform, his VIP birthday bonus was a mere $200—a paltry reward for such high-volume play.

Despite these detailed complaints, Roobet has offered no public response for over 41 days, and all VIP-related posts on the topic have gone silent for 48 hours. This pattern of ignoring player grievances, especially around blocked withdrawals and minimal VIP treatment, raises serious concerns about the casino's reliability and respect for its high-value customers.

No movement on either VIP complaint as silence enters day 39

For 39 days, two separate VIP complaints against Roobet have sat unanswered—one involving a blocked $400,000 withdrawal—while the casino continues to collect millions from streamers. Neither Resources247 nor DaniloQ86085 has received any public acknowledgement from Roobet representatives, and the threads have gone completely cold as the community’s focus shifts to a newer affiliate dispute.

Resources247 describes a troubling pattern of deliberate withdrawal cancellations and self-exclusion manipulations, saying the casino makes a player lose their funds back—not once, but three times. Meanwhile, DaniloQ86085, who claims to have bet $2 million on Roobet, received only a $200 birthday VIP bonus, calling it 'maybe the worst VIP ever.' These experiences paint a picture of VIP customers being ignored or undervalued, even as high-profile streamers collect enormous sums.

With zero responses from Roobet after 41 days and both complaints now silent for 48 hours, players considering the casino must weigh this pattern of unaddressed grievances. The silence suggests a lack of accountability that makes it difficult to trust Roobet with significant deposits or loyalty—especially when VIP treatment appears uneven and complaints go unresolved.

No movement as both Resources247 and DaniloQ86085 complaints go cold without resolution

Two VIP complaints against Roobet have gone completely silent after 48 hours with no new posts, extending a 41-day streak without any response or resolution from the casino. The first complaint, from user Resources247, alleges that Roobet deliberately blocked his withdrawal and canceled his self-exclusion three separate times, causing him to lose his funds. In his own words, he accused the casino of doing this "not once not twice but three times," suggesting a pattern of intentional obstruction.

The second complaint, from DaniloQ86085, highlights a disappointing VIP experience after wagering $2 million on the platform. On his birthday, he received a mere $200 VIP bonus, which he described as "maybe the worst VIP ever." Like the first complaint, this thread has seen no engagement from any Roobet representative, and both have become dormant as community attention shifts to a separate affiliate dispute. For players evaluating Roobet's trustworthiness, these unresolved grievances—especially the serious allegation of blocked withdrawals and canceled self-exclusion—raise significant red flags about the casino's commitment to fair treatment of high-volume players.