ME token stakers are questioning Dicey again after the $100M volume milestone, with 6 posts in 24 hours asking when rewards will flow to $ME holders.

ME staker discontent persists as Dicey posts record volumes

Despite Dicey celebrating $100 million in May volume and projecting a $200 million June pace, a vocal faction of ME token holders remains deeply dissatisfied, accusing the team of abandoning them after the pivot to a crypto casino.

In the past 24 hours, six posts have surfaced from stakers demanding clarity on when they will see rewards. One user bluntly warned that 'all the money will go into the project owner's pocket,' while another escalated the language to calling the pivot a 'scam' and a 'rug pull.'

One particularly angry holder claimed Dicey 'fleeced their investors, community, and token holders,' alleging the team raised roughly $200 million for a multichain NFT marketplace before firing staff and pivoting. Another pleaded with the team not to 'walk away from us,' insisting 'there is no win if you leave those who got you here behind.'

The Dicey team has not publicly responded to these questions in recent days, leaving stakers feeling ignored and fueling suspicions that their loyalty was exploited for a sudden business shift.

ME staker complaints remain a whisper as Dicey posts record volumes

A small but vocal group of ME token holders continues to question Dicey's pivot away from the token, even as the casino posts record volumes. Their complaints, however, remain a faint whisper against a tide of player excitement. One user bluntly warned that all generated revenue would end up in the project owner's pocket, while another former holder sarcastically noted their monthly allowance had dwindled to less than $10. These grievances are not new — they echo concerns raised long ago.

Dicey has offered no public response to these lingering fears, and the broader community — now overwhelmingly focused on casino gameplay — has shown zero engagement with the token holders' frustrations. The volume of complaints is negligible compared to the flood of big-win excitement. For a player weighing trust, this silence from the team and the indifference of other users suggest that the casino's priorities have firmly shifted away from the original token staker community.

Zero ME posts in 48 hours — grievances fade to background noise

Despite a brief outburst from former supporters like Chefepreneur mocking the token's meager monthly allowance and ChelyabinskGang demanding an explanation for a ban, the ME token debate has fallen silent over the past 48 hours. The casino community's attention has shifted entirely to other events, suggesting that these lingering grievances no longer command the spotlight.

However, deeper trust concerns remain unresolved, as highlighted by gibfiddle's scathing accusation that Dicey raised approximately $200 million for a multichain NFT marketplace before firing staff and pivoting to a crypto casino. Such criticisms, even when not trending, raise serious red flags for players evaluating whether the platform can be trusted with their funds or loyalty.

For any player considering Dicey, the quiet dismissal of token holder frustrations does not erase the underlying narrative of a project that abandoned its original community and mission. The absence of active complaints today does not guarantee that similar treatment won't be applied to future users or investors.

ME token complaints vanish completely — zero posts in 72 hours

On June 19, ME token holders like Chefepreneur and c20030710 voiced sharp complaints—one mocking a sub-$10 monthly allowance and another alleging funds funneled into the project owner's pocket—but then the conversation abruptly died. Over the next 72 hours, not a single new post about ME tokens appeared, as the community’s attention shifted entirely to chrizzy's max win afterglow, trustyneo's Keno run, and DiceyHQ's latest giveaway.

Even ChelyabinskGang's demand for an explanation about a ban, directed at DiceyHQ, failed to rekindle the ME token debate. The silence suggested stakers had either given up or were waiting for the next catalyst—a pattern that would later resurface when the $100M volume milestone reignited their questions about rewards.