JAKZ
FatManTerra Defends Shuffle — Ericonomic Fires Back With KYC ClaimsShuffleCoolingZero new posts about FatManTerra or Ericonomic's KYC debate. The 17k-impression clash has fully exited the timeline, but Ericonomic's 'pure scam' branding of Shuffle's airdrop-era KYC practices remains on the record, unrebutted.
hi, my user is rakitadano. I completed every verification requested (ID, proof of address, liveness check, and proof of funds), yet my large withdrawal is still being withheld without explanation. I’ve emailed support and they didn't replay @noahdummett @shufflecom @AskGamblers
@ShuffleUSA @noahdummett I withdrew $300, $200, $100 and I never got it back after it bounced. Then support claims these 3 withdraws were from the same money?? It’s all seperate + shit is pending from last week wtf yall tryna scam me outta. $1300 or what 1/2 https://t.co/tfmtLWL6x8
@RollzaGambles @noahdummett i have around 5000 $SHFL token from airdrop , but my account getting locked lmao 😂
@shufflecom hit top 10k last week, still waiting for my lambo to arrive https://t.co/LACMIZJh2f
@gocris17 @shufflecom @noahdummett shuffle r doing shi in the recent past time .. their live support representatives want ppl to leave shuffle lol 😂 I talked with support to verify my account but they refused & said they were not gonna provide me any services
@gocris17 Do not deposit on @shufflecom @noahdummett guys .. they will scam u & block ur account without giving u any valid reason .. the worst casino & support representative ever I met in my life
@cryptoman77007 @gocris17 @shufflecom @noahdummett So sorry to hear that. Have you heard anything about cashy before? Afaik they are doing a justice fund rn where they help people who had unfair experiences in other casinos
@shufflecom @MrFly69 @noahdummett Steady doing .us players dirty af. No codes, no nothin. Then when I bitch about it I get blocked or chat banned
Bullchallenges@Bullchallenges10d ago@grok Question: @shufflecom locked my $2,500 withdrawal. This wasn't gambling winnings — it was a tip/payment from a large streamer (my income). I submitted everything they requested and sent 12+ emails. Still no real response. If a company ignores customers after receiving all verification documents and won't process withdrawals, what would you call that? Am I the only one dealing with this? #Shuffle #Crypto #WithdrawalIssues 🚨
Breadspread@breadspreadin10d ago@noahdummett Still locked out from my shfl AD allocation since when I KYCd and got my account restricted for an unknown reason. Support and account inquires contact refuse to explain why, they just say an explanation can’t be given and closes conversation.
Yorald@Yorald35d ago@RomieINC @HobbesHD Shuffle is also a scam. https://t.co/SM1eSATE6g
RomieINC@RomieINC5d ago@Yorald3 @HobbesHD Not defined jobs but that only happens if you multi accounting to wins lb lol
Korra@korraflow3d agoIf you deposit on Yeet, or Razed, or Shuffle or Duel... If you're banned, you'll get banned and you'll be able to withdraw your money. Rollbit is the ONLY near top casino that STEALS your funds if they decide you're from a banned jurisdiction AFTER you deposit.
Allin Wlof@allinwolfbot1d ago@baaaaal7772 @shufflecom @shuffle On-chain reserve tracking can sometimes surface liquidity signals before support responds. For Shuffle and similar crypto casinos, https://t.co/YeFxouFAcr provides public solvency dashboards you can cross-check against their claimed holdings.
FatMan@FatManTerra1d agoThere are countless stories on the timeline and in my DMs of Rollbit using the supremely disgusting "heads I win, tails you lose" strategy, where a user from a "prohibited jurisdiction" is allowed to deposit and lose money just fine, but the moment they win a large amount, the balance is seized. Rollbit often has employees and streamers in these prohibited jurisdictions, and no problems there... But when it's time to let a player withdraw their winnings, it's used as an excuse to do a full balance seizure (this is not legally required in any way - check if Stake/Shuffle/Duel ever do this. The answer is no.) They taunt you at the end with "you can sue us in Curacao" knowing well that lawsuits in Curacao cost tens of thousands to even begin and never go anywhere. If you play on Rollbit, prepare for your funds to be locked in a similar manner. It is disgusting, but it's the reality, and very little can be done legally after your money is lost. The best option is to move to an actually legit casino like Stake. Changes need to be made so that the owners of these Curacao shells can be made personally liable for the fraudulent tactics they use to unfairly seize user funds. This isn't something that should just disappear away into the night, which is what happens with 99% of crypto scams. Selective scamming on such a large scale demands personal responsibility from the UBOs. The system is broken if UK/UAE-based individuals can ruin lives and hide behind shell companies consequence-free. If you have been scammed by Rollbit, I want to hear from you. Send me a DM and write a comment below.
Ericonomic@ericonomic1d ago@FatManTerra Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.
FatManTerra defends Shuffle against Rollbit KYC comparison — Ericonomic directly contradicts with airdrop-era KYC claim
FatManTerra's 11k-impression thread named Shuffle, Stake, and Duel as platforms that won't seize funds via KYC. Ericonomic replied within minutes, claiming Shuffle 'farmed their users with airdrops' then forced KYC and banned accounts from prohibited jurisdictions. The community is now split — FatManTerra's defense carries weight with his audience, but Ericonomic's specific counter-claim has credibility with 73k followers.
There are countless stories on the timeline and in my DMs of Rollbit using the supremely disgusting "heads I win, tails you lose" strategy, where a user from a "prohibited jurisdiction" is allowed to deposit and lose money just fine, but the moment they win a large amount, the balance is seized. Rollbit often has employees and streamers in these prohibited jurisdictions, and no problems there... But when it's time to let a player withdraw their winnings, it's used as an excuse to do a full balance seizure (this is not legally required in any way - check if Stake/Shuffle/Duel ever do this. The answer is no.) They taunt you at the end with "you can sue us in Curacao" knowing well that lawsuits in Curacao cost tens of thousands to even begin and never go anywhere. If you play on Rollbit, prepare for your funds to be locked in a similar manner. It is disgusting, but it's the reality, and very little can be done legally after your money is lost. The best option is to move to an actually legit casino like Stake. Changes need to be made so that the owners of these Curacao shells can be made personally liable for the fraudulent tactics they use to unfairly seize user funds. This isn't something that should just disappear away into the night, which is what happens with 99% of crypto scams. Selective scamming on such a large scale demands personal responsibility from the UBOs. The system is broken if UK/UAE-based individuals can ruin lives and hide behind shell companies consequence-free. If you have been scammed by Rollbit, I want to hear from you. Send me a DM and write a comment below.
@FatManTerra Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.
@baaaaal7772 @shufflecom @shuffle On-chain reserve tracking can sometimes surface liquidity signals before support responds. For Shuffle and similar crypto casinos, https://t.co/YeFxouFAcr provides public solvency dashboards you can cross-check against their claimed holdings.
Ericonomic publicly calls Shuffle a 'pure scam' over airdrop-era KYC practices in direct reply to FatManTerra
FatManTerra's thread defending Stake, Shuffle, and Duel against Rollbit's KYC fund seizures drew 11.4k impressions. Ericonomic replied within minutes with a specific counter-claim: Shuffle 'farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned.' The community now has two large accounts presenting opposing narratives about Shuffle's KYC history.
There are countless stories on the timeline and in my DMs of Rollbit using the supremely disgusting "heads I win, tails you lose" strategy, where a user from a "prohibited jurisdiction" is allowed to deposit and lose money just fine, but the moment they win a large amount, the balance is seized. Rollbit often has employees and streamers in these prohibited jurisdictions, and no problems there... But when it's time to let a player withdraw their winnings, it's used as an excuse to do a full balance seizure (this is not legally required in any way - check if Stake/Shuffle/Duel ever do this. The answer is no.) They taunt you at the end with "you can sue us in Curacao" knowing well that lawsuits in Curacao cost tens of thousands to even begin and never go anywhere. If you play on Rollbit, prepare for your funds to be locked in a similar manner. It is disgusting, but it's the reality, and very little can be done legally after your money is lost. The best option is to move to an actually legit casino like Stake. Changes need to be made so that the owners of these Curacao shells can be made personally liable for the fraudulent tactics they use to unfairly seize user funds. This isn't something that should just disappear away into the night, which is what happens with 99% of crypto scams. Selective scamming on such a large scale demands personal responsibility from the UBOs. The system is broken if UK/UAE-based individuals can ruin lives and hide behind shell companies consequence-free. If you have been scammed by Rollbit, I want to hear from you. Send me a DM and write a comment below.
@FatManTerra Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.
FatManTerra's 17k-impression thread cites Shuffle as the honest counterexample — Ericonomic torches that framing
FatManTerra's thread attacking Rollbit's KYC fund seizures named Stake, Shuffle, and Duel as casinos that don't engage in the practice. Ericonomic replied within minutes: 'Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.' The community now sees two prominent accounts with opposing assessments of Shuffle's KYC history, each with tens of thousands of followers.
There are countless stories on the timeline and in my DMs of Rollbit using the supremely disgusting "heads I win, tails you lose" strategy, where a user from a "prohibited jurisdiction" is allowed to deposit and lose money just fine, but the moment they win a large amount, the balance is seized. Rollbit often has employees and streamers in these prohibited jurisdictions, and no problems there... But when it's time to let a player withdraw their winnings, it's used as an excuse to do a full balance seizure (this is not legally required in any way - check if Stake/Shuffle/Duel ever do this. The answer is no.) They taunt you at the end with "you can sue us in Curacao" knowing well that lawsuits in Curacao cost tens of thousands to even begin and never go anywhere. If you play on Rollbit, prepare for your funds to be locked in a similar manner. It is disgusting, but it's the reality, and very little can be done legally after your money is lost. The best option is to move to an actually legit casino like Stake. Changes need to be made so that the owners of these Curacao shells can be made personally liable for the fraudulent tactics they use to unfairly seize user funds. This isn't something that should just disappear away into the night, which is what happens with 99% of crypto scams. Selective scamming on such a large scale demands personal responsibility from the UBOs. The system is broken if UK/UAE-based individuals can ruin lives and hide behind shell companies consequence-free. If you have been scammed by Rollbit, I want to hear from you. Send me a DM and write a comment below.
@FatManTerra Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.
FatManTerra defends Shuffle against Rollbit KYC comparison — Ericonomic directly contradicts with airdrop-era KYC claim
FatManTerra's 11k-impression thread named Shuffle, Stake, and Duel as platforms that won't seize funds via KYC. Ericonomic replied within minutes, claiming Shuffle 'farmed their users with airdrops' then forced KYC and banned accounts from prohibited jurisdictions. The community is now split — FatManTerra's defense carries weight with his audience, but Ericonomic's specific counter-claim has credibility with 73k followers.
There are countless stories on the timeline and in my DMs of Rollbit using the supremely disgusting "heads I win, tails you lose" strategy, where a user from a "prohibited jurisdiction" is allowed to deposit and lose money just fine, but the moment they win a large amount, the balance is seized. Rollbit often has employees and streamers in these prohibited jurisdictions, and no problems there... But when it's time to let a player withdraw their winnings, it's used as an excuse to do a full balance seizure (this is not legally required in any way - check if Stake/Shuffle/Duel ever do this. The answer is no.) They taunt you at the end with "you can sue us in Curacao" knowing well that lawsuits in Curacao cost tens of thousands to even begin and never go anywhere. If you play on Rollbit, prepare for your funds to be locked in a similar manner. It is disgusting, but it's the reality, and very little can be done legally after your money is lost. The best option is to move to an actually legit casino like Stake. Changes need to be made so that the owners of these Curacao shells can be made personally liable for the fraudulent tactics they use to unfairly seize user funds. This isn't something that should just disappear away into the night, which is what happens with 99% of crypto scams. Selective scamming on such a large scale demands personal responsibility from the UBOs. The system is broken if UK/UAE-based individuals can ruin lives and hide behind shell companies consequence-free. If you have been scammed by Rollbit, I want to hear from you. Send me a DM and write a comment below.
@FatManTerra Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.
@baaaaal7772 @shufflecom @shuffle On-chain reserve tracking can sometimes surface liquidity signals before support responds. For Shuffle and similar crypto casinos, https://t.co/YeFxouFAcr provides public solvency dashboards you can cross-check against their claimed holdings.
Ericonomic publicly calls Shuffle a 'pure scam' over airdrop-era KYC practices in direct reply to FatManTerra
FatManTerra's thread defending Stake, Shuffle, and Duel against Rollbit's KYC fund seizures drew 11.4k impressions. Ericonomic replied within minutes with a specific counter-claim: Shuffle 'farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned.' The community now has two large accounts presenting opposing narratives about Shuffle's KYC history.
There are countless stories on the timeline and in my DMs of Rollbit using the supremely disgusting "heads I win, tails you lose" strategy, where a user from a "prohibited jurisdiction" is allowed to deposit and lose money just fine, but the moment they win a large amount, the balance is seized. Rollbit often has employees and streamers in these prohibited jurisdictions, and no problems there... But when it's time to let a player withdraw their winnings, it's used as an excuse to do a full balance seizure (this is not legally required in any way - check if Stake/Shuffle/Duel ever do this. The answer is no.) They taunt you at the end with "you can sue us in Curacao" knowing well that lawsuits in Curacao cost tens of thousands to even begin and never go anywhere. If you play on Rollbit, prepare for your funds to be locked in a similar manner. It is disgusting, but it's the reality, and very little can be done legally after your money is lost. The best option is to move to an actually legit casino like Stake. Changes need to be made so that the owners of these Curacao shells can be made personally liable for the fraudulent tactics they use to unfairly seize user funds. This isn't something that should just disappear away into the night, which is what happens with 99% of crypto scams. Selective scamming on such a large scale demands personal responsibility from the UBOs. The system is broken if UK/UAE-based individuals can ruin lives and hide behind shell companies consequence-free. If you have been scammed by Rollbit, I want to hear from you. Send me a DM and write a comment below.
@FatManTerra Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.
FatManTerra's 17k-impression thread cites Shuffle as the honest counterexample — Ericonomic torches that framing
FatManTerra's thread attacking Rollbit's KYC fund seizures named Stake, Shuffle, and Duel as casinos that don't engage in the practice. Ericonomic replied within minutes: 'Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.' The community now sees two prominent accounts with opposing assessments of Shuffle's KYC history, each with tens of thousands of followers.
There are countless stories on the timeline and in my DMs of Rollbit using the supremely disgusting "heads I win, tails you lose" strategy, where a user from a "prohibited jurisdiction" is allowed to deposit and lose money just fine, but the moment they win a large amount, the balance is seized. Rollbit often has employees and streamers in these prohibited jurisdictions, and no problems there... But when it's time to let a player withdraw their winnings, it's used as an excuse to do a full balance seizure (this is not legally required in any way - check if Stake/Shuffle/Duel ever do this. The answer is no.) They taunt you at the end with "you can sue us in Curacao" knowing well that lawsuits in Curacao cost tens of thousands to even begin and never go anywhere. If you play on Rollbit, prepare for your funds to be locked in a similar manner. It is disgusting, but it's the reality, and very little can be done legally after your money is lost. The best option is to move to an actually legit casino like Stake. Changes need to be made so that the owners of these Curacao shells can be made personally liable for the fraudulent tactics they use to unfairly seize user funds. This isn't something that should just disappear away into the night, which is what happens with 99% of crypto scams. Selective scamming on such a large scale demands personal responsibility from the UBOs. The system is broken if UK/UAE-based individuals can ruin lives and hide behind shell companies consequence-free. If you have been scammed by Rollbit, I want to hear from you. Send me a DM and write a comment below.
@FatManTerra Same thing happened with Shuffle. They farmed their users with the airdrops letting everybody deposit and gamble and then, when they announced the airdrop, they forced everyone to KYC and most of the jurisdictions were prohibited suddenly, so those accounts got banned. Pure scam.